Archive for category politics

Date: July 17th, 2010
Cate: climate change, politics, research

Into the fray

After skulking around nytimes.com message forums and reading exasperating commenters on The Atlantic, I decided to enter the “argument-by-comment” war on climate change by posting a comment on a Jim Manzi’s current meta-discussion of the climate debate. Typically, when I read these things the particular discussion is either so out-of-date or so dominated by nutjobs that I don’t feel like it’s worth contributing.

I don’t really know anything about Jim Manzi. But on this particular blog the level of discourse was pretty high and the latest post was fewer than four hours old. Plus I had just attended the Gordon Research Conference on Industrial Ecology (about which I can tell you nothing or I’d have to kill you– well, let’s say, “sequester” you). So I felt both qualified and compelled to respond.

I used my real name and linked to my blog, so I decided I had better go ahead and own up.

more))

Date: June 25th, 2010
Cate: politics

Regulation: ur doin it wrong

Bank stocks soar on financial regulation agreement (google / AP)

NEW YORK — Bank stocks shot higher Friday after an agreement on a financial regulation bill reassured investors that new rules won’t devastate financial companies’ profits.

Banks outdistanced the rest of the market after congressional negotiators agreed on a bill that increases the regulation of financial companies, but that doesn’t include some of the harshest provisions that the government originally proposed. The legislation imposes new rules on the complex investments known as derivates, but the rules aren’t as strict as investors feared. It also includes a far milder version of what’s been called the Volcker rule. That rule, named after former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, would have banned commercial banks from trading simply to increase their profits, a practice known as proprietary trading.

Analysts said the deal removes a huge cloud that has hovered over the financial industry for much of this year. Investors have feared that intense regulation would devastate bank profits. Now, the market seems to believe that financial companies would do well even with the new limits on their business.

“They come out of this big-time winners,” Bob Froehlich, senior managing director at Hartford Financial Services, said of financial companies. “Two years later, people will look back and say ‘My gosh, nothing really changed.’”

Date: February 16th, 2010
Cate: politics
1 msg

Drawing a line for the denialists

With the unending avalanche of embarrassments in climate science recently, global warming “deniers” are becoming ever more strident in their triumphalism over defeat of the “warmists.” I must admit that I have not familiarized myself with the science behind the IPCC report.  But there is a simple, irrefutable fact that those committed to rational inquiry must not lose track of, and that is that we have been pumping a hell of a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

This can be corroborated with CO2 measurements from around the world and is really not contested.

However, some people seem to still believe that this change could not be caused by human activity.  Here I present a simple, back-of-the-envelope computation to measure the total weight of CO2 in the atmosphere, compared to the total weight of CO2 released by burning fossil fuels. more))

Date: July 2nd, 2009
Cate: politics
1 msg

Spouting off…

So many opinions.. so much discussion.. so much controversy..

Every now and then (and today, at 12:40 PM I still haven’t headed in to work yet) I like to pass an hour of time by going to the New York Times opinion page and clicking on everything with a remotely interesting headline.  Lately this habit has become more fun because of schadenfreude

Well, really, it’s not schadenfreude– I was unemployed myself just months ago– as it is a sort of Vonnegut-like glee at catastrophe.  The whole world seems to be going to hell, and you see it in the unemployment numbers as well as the torturous debate about new media, which is really a debate about the future of knowledge.  What inspired me to post today (and here begins the eponymous spouting off) is the symmetry among the various themes of culture, economy, and ecology, the latter vis-a-vis the weak but still transformational climate change bill which, weakened as it is, will never make it past the (appallingly timid) US senate.

more))